Home
Discover Islam
Quran Recitations
Lectures
Fatwa
Articles
Fiqh
E-Books
Women
Boys & Girls 
ArticlesQuestion:
Asalama alaikum wa rahmatullah, Please help me out on this. My brother claims that if someone started fasting ramadan for example in Saudi where they started on 27th september and then travelled to India where they started on 29th september, he should continue fasting and finish with indians even though he has finished 30days as per the calender of saudi that he started with. Is it acceptable to fast more than 30days? please reply with references fromt he quran and sunnah which will make him understand better. Thanks
Fatwa:
All perfect praise be to Allah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify that there is none worthy of worship except Allah, and that Muhammad 
is His slave and Messenger.
is His slave and Messenger. There are different opinions of the scholars 
about a person who started fasting in one country and then travelled to another country where they started fasting later than the first country, whether he should continue fasting with the second country even if he exceeded 30 days from when he started fasting, or should he break the fast and not exceed thirty days.
about a person who started fasting in one country and then travelled to another country where they started fasting later than the first country, whether he should continue fasting with the second country even if he exceeded 30 days from when he started fasting, or should he break the fast and not exceed thirty days. An-Nawawi 
said: ''If a person starts fasting in a country and then he travels to another remote country where the moon was not sighted at the same time as the first country, and he had already completed thirty days of fasting from the time he started, then, if we say that each country has its own ruling in regard to the sighting of the moon, there are two opinions about this:
said: ''If a person starts fasting in a country and then he travels to another remote country where the moon was not sighted at the same time as the first country, and he had already completed thirty days of fasting from the time he started, then, if we say that each country has its own ruling in regard to the sighting of the moon, there are two opinions about this: 1- The most preponderant opinion is that he is obliged to fast like them as he is amongst them.
2- He should break the fast because he acted according to the ruling which applies to the first country.
If we say that the sighting of the moon applies to all countries, then the people of the second country are obliged to break the fast at the same time as the first country if the sighting of the moon was confirmed for them by the statement of the person [who travelled] or any other person, but they are obliged to make up for the first day. However, if this is not confirmed in the second country, then he (the person who started before them in a different country) is obliged to break the fast as if he was the only one who sighted the moon, but he should break the fast secretly.'' [End of quotation].
According to our view in Islamweb, each country has its own sighting, therefore, the most correct opinion, according to Imaam An-Nawawi in this issue, is that if one travelled to another country where they started fasting later than his country, is obliged to fast with them even if he fasted more than thirty days. However, he may break the fast secretly if he acts according to the second opinion which is also a considerable one.
in this issue, is that if one travelled to another country where they started fasting later than his country, is obliged to fast with them even if he fasted more than thirty days. However, he may break the fast secretly if he acts according to the second opinion which is also a considerable one. To conclude, the scholars have different opinions about the issue, and whichever opinion one follows, he should not be blamed. Nonetheless, there is no absolute evidence from the Quran or the Sunnah of the Prophet about it.
have different opinions about the issue, and whichever opinion one follows, he should not be blamed. Nonetheless, there is no absolute evidence from the Quran or the Sunnah of the Prophet about it. Allah Knows best.
Fatwa answered by:The Fatwa Center at Islamweb
